Recap Time
18 subscribers
446 photos
21 videos
2 files
1.69K links
Post-battle summaries in @chtwrs, forwards from different chats we liked, FAQs from our handbook's Community Hub, etc. Also for archives in our chats.

Discussion: @RecapTime_LiveChat
Main Channel: @UpdatesFromThePinsTeam
Inquiries: @AJHalili2006
Download Telegram
🔁 RT @FrozieArtz: You don't need to tell me if you are unfollow me
Just unfollow lmao, you just trying to make me feel guilty for that

My acc become trash btw soo..
🔁 RT @heyblake: Never been a better time in history to make digital dough.

Here's 42 ways to make your first $1 online: https://t.co/ZyRwdrX4CM
🔁 RT @iVorare: Nikusa learned a lot from Squishy https://t.co/JJ68T0xGyX
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔁 RT @AvniGupta_: Me: When I open up the Light Theme by mistake https://t.co/8zv17CKH3h
🔁 RT @Snowden: Yesterday, the government sued the publisher of #PermanentRecord for—not kidding—printing it without giving the CIA and NSA a change to erase details of their classified crimes from the manuscript. Today, it is the best-selling book in the world: https://t.co/oMJLOvUjG7
Want to take down content for just telling the truth?

Well, go f*** yourself. You're not welcome here.

Example of this BS: https://t.co/MLY8PCh0eH
🔁 RT @Snowden: When a crooked politician calls me traitor, ask yourself: who did I betray? The courts have ruled repeatedly that the programs I revealed were unlawful, and likely unconstitutional—a violation of your rights.

If this is treason, what they call loyalty is a crime.
🔁 RT @charlie_savage: Ellsberg said he would not strike such a plea deal, and would handle his defense to tee up for the Supreme Court to confront whether it violates the First Amendment to use that WW I-era law to criminalize unauthorized disclosures of government secrets in the public interest./end https://t.co/LtRzCcJvNm
🔁 RT @MalwareTechBlog: What's upsetting is there's been many suicides as a result of ransomware. They've hit hospitals, charities, medical suppliers, but apparently where we draw the line is temporary disruption to a dinosaur juice pipeline.
🔁 RT @MalwareTechBlog: I'm focusing on pre-recorded infosec content to grow my channel, but once I reach 50k subscribers I'll throw in some live streams as well 🥰
https://t.co/5ncH5A65Yn https://t.co/cZOtCwvzAK
🔁 RT @MalwareTechBlog: Me: *trying to sleep*
Brain: “remember that time when you were 6 and your school tried to promote inclusivity by banning everyone from hanging out with their friends and instead randomly assigned you mandatory friends”
🔁 RT @WylieNewmark: Dead on. As I said on my blog in February, the case-centric approach of law enforcement is at loggerheads with the need to swiftly interdict ransomware operations at all phases of an intrusion so as preempt disruptive impacts of successful deployments. https://t.co/5HHGUOskch https://t.co/dFBQ6rMWrj
🔁 RT @MalwareTechBlog: Everyone after they ban cryptocurrency to stop ransomware and ransomware just switches to another payment method https://t.co/pPxETUFlzT https://t.co/tq4fJVhmJ6
🔁 RT @MalwareTechBlog: It wasn't even that long ago that cybercriminals were siphoning hundred of millions from corporate bank accounts without their knowledge. We really going to pretend they can't do USD ransomware payments?
🔁 RT @figburn: among us gummies https://t.co/ekoOgeiHc4
🔁 RT @matthew_d_green: This article about end-to-end encryption and authorities’ desire to perform real-time content scanning is very well written and I hope you’ll read it. It also makes me pretty angry. https://t.co/YQijeQgRL6