SEO практика

‍
PBN-ите работят ли още?

Дискусия https://www.facebook.com/groups/seopraktika/permalink/927635398177668/

66 views02:42

Indexing Paradigm Shift

It's too early to be absolutely certain, but it is my strong suspicion that the changes we have seen in indexing, where many sites at the lower end of the 'global importance' spectrum are not getting content indexed as quickly as previously, or in some cases, having difficulty getting it indexed at all, is not entirely a temporary situation.

You see, it comes after some years of mumblings and rumblings within Google about their issues with quantity over quality spam. And coincidentally, follows right on the heels of vague announcements about new methods of dealing with spam in a spam update.

The problem for Google was sites like Quora, and a hundred other similar sites, where masses of user-generated content could produce literally hundreds of thousands of new pages over the course of just a few hours. Yet the vast majority of the new URLs this created were most often just rehashes of the same discussions on a thousand already indexed threads and URLs from the same site.

Then there is the increasing availability of so-called AI copy writing software. Software that can create huge volumes of very low quality content at almost no cost in resources. Now, Machine-generated Content spam is, despite the bullshit by the so-called AI content software, nothing new. There was software that did much the same thing years and years ago that scraped and spun existing content into new forms according to a set of rules and instructions, and all the new software is doing is calling those rules and instructions "AI".

Google have systems to deal with this.

I just believe that they are improving and extending them. Crawl Prioritization has always existed in Google, and is largely a scaleable, self-regulating thing. Every known URL that Google wants to crawl, either to index for the first time, or to revisit to check for updates, is assigned a place in the long queue according to a priority scoring system. Ultra-high priority pages and revisits get taken care of almost at once, while at the other end, ultra-low priority URLs may wait months or even years, and possibly never get a turn at all, as higher priority items get added to the queue ahead of them.

It has always been quite typical that an 'average' website with 'average' importance and link popularity values for its size would have about 90% of its content indexed, and about 10% not indexed, at any given point in time. Sites such as Amazon and Ebay might have a far, far higher percentage of unindexed product pages simply because they change so quickly, and are often at such deep levels of the site in terms of links to follow.

However, over the past years, I have seen a steady increase in the number of regular, average-ish business sites that have been advised to blog and create fresh content every few days, have a MAJORITY of their content not be freshly indexed and reindexed.

Basically, what PageRank was going into and around the site from the few pages that earned any genuine links was being spread so thin by flowing to all the thousands of essentially pointless blog posts nobody cared about, that the strength in any one page was diluted to the point where it just wasn't seen as important.

My suspicion then is that Google have tightened this up, just a little, to help them find truly worthwhile pages even in a swamp of dross, and at the same time, make it much clearer to quantity spammers that their tactic is self-destructive.

So, all of this means that the following is my advice on how to focus with content going forward:

First, do not publish new stuff just to publish new stuff. If a new page is not built to convert for a specific campaign (e.g. a new product line), or is not a well-thought out piece of content you are sure will attract a bunch of genuine new citations, rethink it.

You need to focus on more results from less pages going forward.

64 views12:37